Link: http://www.10news.com/news/19562217/detail.html

Couple: County Trying To Stop Home Bible Studies

POSTED: 5:31 pm PDT May 25, 2009
UPDATED: 1:45 pm PDT May 28, 2009
SAN DIEGO – A local pastor and his wife claim they were interrogated by a San Diego County official, who then threatened them with escalating fines if they continued to hold Bible studies in their home, 10News reported.

Attorney Dean Broyles of The Western Center For Law & Policy was shocked with what happened to the pastor and his wife.

Broyles said, “The county asked, ‘Do you have a regular meeting in your home?’ She said, ‘Yes.’ ‘Do you say amen?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Do you pray?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Do you say praise the Lord?’ ‘Yes.’”

The county employee notified the couple that the small Bible study, with an average of 15 people attending, was in violation of County regulations, according to Broyles.

Broyles said a few days later the couple received a written warning that listed “unlawful use of land” and told them to “stop religious assembly or apply for a major use permit” – a process that could cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Read more…

Link: http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/inquirer/20090128_Editorial__Judges_Sentenced.html#

Private/Public Partnerships - Kids for Cash Judges Sentenced.

Link: http://www.city-journal.org/2009/eon0212wo.html

Children’s books burn, courtesy of the federal government (U.S.)

12 February 2009

It’s hard to believe, but true: under a law Congress passed last year aimed at regulating hazards in children’s products, the federal government has now advised that children’s books published before 1985 should not be considered safe and may in many cases be unlawful to sell or distribute. Merchants, thrift stores, and booksellers may be at risk if they sell older volumes, or even give them away, without first subjecting them to testing—at prohibitive expense. Many used-book sellers, consignment stores, Goodwill outlets, and the like have accordingly begun to refuse new donations of pre-1985 volumes, yank existing ones off their shelves, and in some cases discard them en masse…Read more.

Link: http://independentcandidates.wordpress.com

For Independent Minded People

The time for Independent Candidates is NOW!

Have you run as an Independent?

Have you considered running as an Independent?

Have you considered helping an Independent?

Have you considered voting for an Independent?

Are you disgusted with the way the mainstream political parties monopolize the political process in Canada?

Are you fed up with local MPs putting the interests of their party over the interests of their constituents?

Are you tired of party leaders whipping the vote to force your MPs to vote against your interests?

If you answered YES to any of these questions, you are urged to attend the first ever Independents convention!

When: Saturday January 17, 2009

Where: Downtown Toronto – Exact Location To Be Announced

Time: 12:00 noon until approximately 8:00 p.m.

Cost (contribution to defray expenses): – Your choice:

- free admission if you help spread the word by inviting 25 people to this event (email and/or post this page: http://independentcandidates.wordpress.com

- $25 payable at the door if you do NOT invite 25 people

Your sponsor and organizer: http://www.independentcandidates.ca

NOTICE OF ACTION!
Contact: David Honey
Tel: 905 562-3659

This is notice to the MNR that if charges of any kind are laid against Bob MacKie as a result of the Niagara Escarpment Commission decision of November 15, 2007 that the Ontario Landowners Association will begin an escalating series of actions that will have significant political consequences. These actions may include tractor blockades of major highways in the Niagara Region.

Seeking to preserve our rural identities, traditions, security, prosperity and the fundamental principles of natural justice

——————————————————————————–

If you require more background information, please contact the following:

David Honey, President, Niagara Landowners Association
Ph: 905 562-3659

Jack MacLaren, President, Ontario Landowners Association
Ph.:613 832-3201
Cell: 613 223-5534

Original Posting…

Here’s an interesting little poll posted today on the website of the Globe and Mail Newspaper.

The question:

“Do you think Canada should work more closely with the U.S. to map out a mutually beneficial public policy agenda?”

The results at the time of this post are interesting to say the least, as you can see from the screen shot below. The question of course is redundant because this is already a reality in both countries. To bad Americans were not more “American” and Canadians too, maybe this would not have happened. It will, however, be a good barometer for the media-merchants to use to determine their next course of action with respect to convincing those of us who still believe in sovereignty and rule of law, that this is a good idea. You know, before they tell us is already a done deal. Can you say “North American Union?” nice try you conspiracy nut…

The poll can be found here.

The results so far..

Related:
Canada, U.S. agree to share troops in civil emergencies

Doug Plumb, confirmed Toronto Centre Riding candidate for the Canadian Action Party, openly discusses Communitarian Law and Agenda 21 as part of his platform. Some snippets from his piece Sustainable Tyranny (pdf) include:

“This booklet is all about the Security & Prosperity Partnership Agreement (otherwise known as the North American Union or the Public Private Partnership between USA, Canada & Mexico. This is a part of the Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 or The New World Order agenda that Bush Sr. talked about in the nineties during the previous Iraq war. These agendas are all about transforming our society to the Third Way, New Soviet and Communitarian legal system. The Third Way is an Ownership society where everything is owned by central powers. Individualism and property rights will become things of the past and unaccountable, autocratic rulers will govern society with an iron-fisted police state.
This is all being set up in secret and no one that only views or reads mainstream/corporate media knows anything about it. If you ever wondered about things like this or where money comes from then read on.

“What pleases me most is that sustainable development is on almost everybody’s agenda now.” - Maurice Strong”

“The type of new world government system is known as a collectivist or communitarian government. You and the product of your labour become the property of government. Individual rights or freedoms have no place in this new world order. This is socialism and it’s being adopted because it doesn’t work for the masses of people (it only works for the people at the very top of the power structure).”

“Fascism occurs as a result of a “public-private partnership” according to Mussolini. Fascism occurs when corporations and governments unite. This is exactly what is happening today in secret. Laws (including your right to habeas-corpus and double jeopardy protection) are being rewritten secretly in stealth with corporations and governments working together and led by the banks. The new laws that will be put into place as a result of the North American Union are known as “communitarian laws.”

“Communitarian law is a type of administrative law. Many lawyers over the past 20 years have made administrative law their specialty. Communitarian law is also known as “The Third Way” or the “New Soviet” and it is a way of centralizing an unaccountable government.”

Visit Doug’s campaign site at dougplumb.com

Link: http://nord.twu.net/acl/2020.html

These two wonderful gals have been sacrificing and struggling for many years to get the word out about the U.N.(among others) plan for our common future. If you want a comprehensive and up to date account of who and what is behind the curtain pulling the levers in your local city councils all the way up to the federal government and beyond, order and read this book. Nobody is going to tell you this stuff, you won’t find it in the papers or on the tell-a-vision. If you want to understand where we are headed and why your voice seems to fall on deaf ears, this book is a good primer. For $20 (includes S&H) you can help support this much needed and quality research.

Site link and ordering info:

2020: Our Common Destiny

From the back cover:

Our common destiny is mandatory

There is an old social theory that in order to create a healthier planet, people everywhere must learn the value of collectivism. If we will just put the community before self-centered concerns, mankind can eliminate war and poverty. To many, it is our evolutionary destiny and our moral duty to comply with the spirit of community.

Communitarianism was embraced by leaders in every nation after it was financed by the international banking elite. Today the theory of community influences all aspects of life: news, science, money, law, land use, health, education, policing and employment, not to mention the arts, fashion, fundraising, causes and entertainment. Community is the buzzword on everybody’s lips these days.

Skeptics claim that an enormous system of control is impossible. Government officials regularly deny plans for national integration at the regional or global levels. But community government is real. As the year 2020 approaches, world domination looks less like an episode of Pinky and the Brain all the time.

Evidence of a supranational government is so abundant that it would take years to study everything about it. 2020: Our Common Destiny is for people who don’t have years to read but want to catch up on what has happened to their world… in under a hundred pages.

Told with spine-chilling quotes and commentary, 2020: Our Common Destiny is the true story of how two American women followed a paper trail from their lowly Seattle neighborhood to the United Nations. Lies and twisted ideology could not hide what they were destined to uncover: our common destiny, a hellish vision of mandatory communitarian utopia.

“Magnificent! A very important educational tool.”
Author and teacher Nancy Levant

“A really good read. Very informative. Thanks for the enlightenment.”
Anchorage Attorney Lance Christian Wells

The following post is posted on Denfendthyself.com. You see taking our land and enforcing a new vision on you is a little difficult if you have the means and ability to defend yourself:

Here is a cached version from Google

You boys better be ready to give up your guns, according to a report called The Human Right Of Self Defense, a subcommission of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) has declared that “there is no human right to personal self-defense and that extremely strict gun control is a human right which all governments are required to enforce immediately.”

The Human Right of Self-Defense
David B. Kopel,1 Paul Gallant2 & Joanne D. Eisen3

I. INTRODUCTION

“Any law, international or municipal, which prohibits recourse to force, is necessarily limited by the right of self-defense.”

Is there a human right to defend oneself against a violent attacker? Is there an individual right to arms under international law? Conversely, are governments guilty of human rights violations if they do not enact strict gun control laws?

The United Nations and some non-governmental organizations have declared that there is no human right to self-defense or to the possession of defensive arms. The UN and allied NGOs further declare that insufficiently restrictive firearms laws are themselves a human rights violation, so all governments must sharply restrict citizen firearms possession.

This Article investigates the legal status of self-defense by examining a broad variety of sources of international law. Based on those sources, the Article suggests that personal self-defense is a well-established human right under international law and is an important foundation of international law itself.

If you start reading this, you start to see that while the U.N. would have a very difficult time to get Congress to pass such draconian laws, it would be another thign to try and collect those guns. An interesting tidbit states, “…a variety of ways, discussed infra, in which purported international law mandates can be imposed on American citizens without legislative consent.”

It also reminds us of the Frey report, written by Barbara Frey, who was put on the HRC subcommission by the Clinton Administration, who strongly supported U.N. gun control efforts. Note to Hillary Clinton supporters; I bet she will also back draconian UN Gun control laws, and push to change our gun laws and I would not doubt even try for a possible grab IF she made it to office.

It goes on to show how completely incompetent and inept the U.N. is, that eventually the HRC was abolished in 2005, after it was shown that some of it’s memebers that promoted gun control were actually members that performed genocide, slave trading, strict control of their citizens, and state terrorism. The Human Rights Council was an oxymoron and actually an adversary of promoting human rights.

Incredibly, the HRC was resurected the next year as the exact same thing and fully embraced the Frey Report which says that all national governments are required by International law to implement various levels of gun control.

I am not liking this women, or the U.N. at all. It gets worse.

Of course the subcommission has little power to enforce its wishes directly, but the declaration gives national government officials, including courts, considerable support to promote restrictive gun laws which are, according to the UN, mandated by international law. The full Human Rights Council is scheduled to take up the issue, and indications at the time of this writing suggest that the full Council will ratify most or all of Frey’s report. The Chairman of the full Human Rights Council has already announced his enthusiastic support for the Frey Report, the subcommission’s adoption of the report, and the prospect of using the Human Rights Council to advance a worldwide gun control mandate.

The Frey Report, then, is not simply a scholarly paper that will be filed away in a United Nations library. It is an effort to establish a new norm of international human rights law, and this effort to establish the new norm is supported by the United Nations Human Rights Council, as one aspect of the UN’s far-ranging support for restrictive and confiscatory firearms policies.

The United Nations General Assembly began drafting an international Arms Trade Treaty in late 2006. A stated purpose of the Arms Trade Treaty is to prohibit arms transfers which violate human rights.51 As interpreted by the HRC and Frey, every firearms sale in the United States would be a human rights violation; this is because even the most restrictive jurisdictions in the United States—such as Washington, D.C., or New York City—do not meet the minimum Frey/HRC gun control standards.

Ok, that’s about all of this I want to write about as I am getting really, really sick. Read the report, understand the U.N. wants your guns, and ask Hillary & the gun grabber Obama if they support the Frey report and do they plan on implementing their gun control mandates?

If you are an elephant, ask Romney (gun grabber), McCain, or Huckster what are their positions on gun control? Lets start talking about real issues, instead of still talking about change. We need change, we need to get the hell out of the United Nations and not put a Socialistic gun grabber in the White house…

Comments?

Christopher Winkler
Provider of Self Defense Products
http://DefendThyself.com

Find out how to recognize and counter facilitation and group manipulation tactics and regain control of your meetings and your future, watch Bev Eakman’s speech in the following video. We all need to understand how and why we are being led to the ridiculous belief that private property, liberty and the rule of law are now undesirable and need to be “transformed” for the benefit of the so-called “common good.”

Visit Freedom Advocates for more excellent videos and presentations: